Basically, if Harry Chose Slytherin

Mr. Hyde (chapter 1)

He is not easy to describe. There is something wrong with his appearance; something displeasing, something downright detestable. I never saw a man I so disliked, and yet I scarce know why. He must be deformed somewhere; he gives a strong feeling of deformity, although I couldn’t specify the point. He’s an extraordinary-looking man, and yet I really can name nothing out of the way.


Dr. Jekyll (chapter 3)


To this rule, Dr. Jekyll was no exception; and as he now sat on the opposite side of the fire — a large, well-made, smooth-faced man of fifty, with something of a slyish cast perhaps, but every mark of capacity and kindness — you could see by his looks that he cherished for Mr. Utterson a sincere and warm affection.

"I have been wanting to speak to you, Jekyll," began the latter. "You know that will of yours?"
A close observer might have gathered that the topic was distasteful; but the doctor carried it off gaily. "My poor Utterson," said he, "you are unfortunate in such a client. I never saw a man so distressed as you were by my will; unless it were that hide-bound pedant, Lanyon, at what he called my scientific heresies. Oh, I know he's a good fellow — you needn't frown — an excellent fellow, and I always mean to see more of him; but a hide-bound pedant for all that; an ignorant, blatant pedant. I was never more disappointed in any man than Lanyon."
"You know I never approved of it," pursued Utterson, ruthlessly disregarding the fresh topic.
"My will? Yes, certainly, I know that," said the doctor, a trifle sharply. "You have told me so."
"Well, I tell you so again," continued the lawyer. "I have been learning something of young Hyde."
The large handsome face of Dr. Jekyll grew pale to the very lips, and there came a blackness about his eyes. "I do not care to hear more," said he. "This is a matter I thought we had agreed to drop."
Compare and Contrast
The descriptions given by Enfield and Jekyll concerning Hyde are staunchly different from one another. For one, Enfield regards Hyde almost exclusively in the visible realm, sporting diction like "appearance", "saw", and "extraordinary-looking". To contrast, Jekyll immediately jumps to shutting down the topic when Hyde is brought up, stating pretty assertively, "I do not care to hear more." However, while the content must certainly be noted, the delivery of the speeches given by the two men in their characterization of Hyde is more pertinent as a reflection of their characters (particularly Jekyll). In accordance with his formality, Enfield states his commentary on Hyde with the utmost clarity, despite being unable to pinpoint precisely where the man has gone wrong. "There is something wrong with his appearance; something displeasing, something downright detestable." Pretty succinct and straightforward. Jekyll, on the other hand, is far more deviant. Despite his ordinary articulation, Jekyll appears to clam up when beseeched about his will, and implicitly, its inclusion of Hyde. When asked, Jekyll begins first with a commentary on the anxious nature of Utterson and concludes with a sneering slight at Dr. Lanyon. At no point in time does Jekyll detail his perception of Hyde, let alone their connection. A little sus, no? Furthermore, in juxtaposition with Enfield's commentary, Jekyll's physical reaction to the matter also puts itself up for scrutiny. While obviously bothered by Hyde, Enfield really seems to be more miffed about the odd, enigmatic individual traversing London's streets than anything else. Enfield's description is purely that of Hyde, without any sort of reflection on Enfield himself. Utterson's conversation with Jekyll is completely oppositional to that of Enfield's, suggesting a deeper investment on behalf of Jekyll regarding Hyde. The audience does not gauge Hyde explicitly, as with Enfield, but in accordance with Jekyll's body language. Additionally, the focus transitions from Hyde himself to the dynamic between Jekyll and Hyde. "... said the doctor, a trifle sharply." And later: "... Dr. Jekyll grew pale to the very lips, and there came a blackness about his eyes." Clearly, Jekyll has a weird relationship with Hyde, and his presence in Utterson and Jekyll's conversation is pressing some equally weird buttons on Jekyll. What's their relationship, why is it such a sore spot for Jekyll, and who the heck is Hyde, anyway? 
A Poem for Two Voices (collab-o w/ Lexie Giglio) 
"Dr. Harry Jekyll; pleased to make your acquaintance." 
Do you not wish for more? 
"Sir, I assure you, my practice is of the most competent and efficient offices in London. Whatever is ailing you, my fellows and I will get to the bottom of it." 
Swine, scum; trivial plebeian. There is more. There is always more. 
"You say you've been experiencing these symptoms for a couple weeks now?" 
A lawful life is abundant with misery. Choose chaos. Choose entropy. 
"And how long has the abdominal pain been plaguing you?" 
Choose me. 
"Have you tried any pharmaceutical remedies prior to your visit today?"
Forsake this. Your hands are empty with power yet full with potential; do not asunder yourself to your inferiors. You could be great.
"Understandable. Well, we'll order you a couple prescriptions that'll hopefully pacify whatever GI turbulence has been going on. If that doesn't do it, just come back in a couple weeks or so." 
Weak. Weak. Choose greater. Choose me. 

Choose me.  (together)
> Explanation
With Jekyll battling the alter-ego of Hyde, I always imagine Hyde as a voice plaguing Jekyll with temptation. For me, I see Jekyll as Harry Potter, and Hyde as the sorting hat in The Sorcerer's Stone: "'Not Slytherin, eh?' said the small voice. 'Are you sure? You could be great, you know, it's all here in your head, and Slytherin will help you on the way to greatness, no doubt about that- no?'" (Rowling 121) The idea of power as a corruptive force and its intersection with humanity's arguably innate lust for power seems like it'd be a common intersection for a respected doctor, particularly given the prestige of his perceived reputation. Ultimately, I wanted to communicate Jekyll's internal dialogue in laymen's terms, with "Hyde" (the alter ego, per se) as the haunting voice of promise beneath Jekyll's daily routine. 

Comments

  1. Hey, Anne Ross! I enjoyed reading you blog post for this week. I liked how you clearly contrasted both Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and the fact that you mentioned how Dr. Jekyll did not want to hint of his connection to Mr. Hyde. Personally, I think his abrupt reaction towards the mention of Hyde made it obvious that something is going on with Mr. Hyde in him. Also, I thought your blog post was well structured and very well focused to answering this week's prompt. The only minor critic I have is the quoting of the whole excerpt in the beginning; I don't think that was necessary since you were able to give sufficient evidence in you response. (But, I understand that some people who may read your post may not have read it.) Also, I like yours and Lexie's poem and how you connected Dr. Jekyll to Harry Potter. Overall, your blog was well done!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey girl! Wow. Amazing job this week with your blog post. You write so vividly and clearly! I think you could have formatted your compare and contrast so that was a little easier to follow, because I found it hard to detect where each point began and end. I loved your poem, and how you connected Hyde to a physical temptation to show that Jekyll is struggling between reality and what's going on inside his head. Overall, great job. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. ANNE ROSS PENDER
    Obviously, the poem for two was awesome and double thumbs up to you for coming up with the Harry Potter relationship that we based it off of. In the comparison section, I really thought that your inclusion of specific textual evidence helped to build your argument. Another thing that you added which I felt was super important and beneficial to your blog post was the analysis of the atmosphere created by the “delivery” of both characters’ dialogue, in addition to the content. Overall, solid blog post(per usual). Keep up the good work!
    Lexie

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Anne Ross! As always, it was quite a joy to read your blog post. I always try to make mine as good as yours are!

    Anyways, I thought that you did a fantastic job analyzing the texts. you brought up several ideas that I had not yet thought of. I appreciated the fact that you bluntly stated that the tone of the passages were clearly as important as the content itself. This is especially evident in the severe tone shift that takes place in Dr. Jekyll near the end of the second passage. Of course, we now know why that is, since Jekyll was hiding ("hyde"ing?? lol) Hyde the entire time! (Or was Jekyll hiding his true feelings behind the character of Hyde?)

    As for the poem, I took a similar approach because I imagine the presence of Hyde always being within Jekyll. It's interesting because I also imagine a sort of angel and devil on the shoulders thing, if you know what I mean. Jekyll is trying to uphold the ideals of a Victorian England society, while Hyde is consistently attempting to create chaos.

    As usual, fantastic job! I always love reading your posts!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Coming back to your blog a little while later and I am again amazed! Although we haven't formally met in person yet I just want to let you know that this is spectacular! I loved your use of word choice and style throughout this blog post, almost making me wish it was longer! (I know you probably don't LOL) But overall, I appreciate the depth and thought of your text analysis and the character relationship dynamic showing within your poem. Keep it up girl!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love this poem! I am not a harry potter fan but you did a great job explaining the comparison to the this text. Good Job of analyzing appearance vs reality. I thought your blog could be structured differently so that viewers comprehend easier. Otherwise great job(olivia bayabona)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Um. Okay. This is a great post. Your poem is AMAZING (!) and your analysis is spot-on. It's specific, critical, and well-written.
    THAT'S.
    WHY.
    YOU.
    GOT.
    THE.
    GRADE.
    YOU.
    GOT.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts